Frequently Asked Questions
About Camera Tickets and Camera Ticket Dismissal
No worries!
We have researched the status of traffic camera enforcement in every state, and we occasionally miss newly implemented legislation. However, that DOES NOT affect your access to the help you need.
Our packet is universal, meaning it will work in every state. That’s because our solution addresses the constitutional and evidentiary issues posed by these automated schemes, no matter where they appear in the United States. To get started, find a Let’s Get Started button anywhere on the site, or click HERE.
Yes. Our response packet is universal and works in all 50 states, because it challenges the constitutional and evidentiary flaws common to all automated camera enforcement schemes.
No problem. Our packet is designed to address government‑contracted vendors, their evidence chain, and their lack of sworn witnesses.
Usually not. The vast majority of customers we have heard from have resolved their tickets through the first written correspondence (the packet we provide). If, instead of dismissing the ticket, the court schedules a contested hearing, it won’t be because you asked for it. Still, it sometimes happens. Sometimes, clerks or judges see our response packet and decide to schedule a contested hearing (who knows their motives) even though the legal process does not allow them to do so. [According to the state statutes governing automated camera infraction schemes, a contested hearing must be requested by the camera ticket recipient (vehicle owner), not by anyone else. And since the response materials we provide state explicitly that the response is not a request for a contested hearing, “nor do I consent to one,” the court can’t credibly claim the response was taken as such.] Keeping in mind that we do not act as legal counsel or give legal advice as to whether to attend a hearing you didn’t ask for… If a hearing is scheduled—despite the response packet being sent to the court on time—come back here, log in to your account, and generate a personalized response to the scheduled contested hearing notice. We call that response our “No Thanks” letter, and we will email it to you for no extra cost. Sometimes courts dismiss the ticket after they get the No Thanks letter, and sometimes they do not. For customers to whom this happens, and the court does not change its tune [if the court schedules a contested hearing and doesn’t reverse itself even after receiving the No Thanks letter], we also provide a simple statement for customers who attend the hearing. Just read it to the judge when you are called.
Every camera ticket should be dismissed because they should not be issued in the first place.
Immediately. Once you complete the intake form and fill in the quick card payment, your personalized packet is generated and emailed to you within a minute. From there, we recommend printing with a good-quality printer and sending the response to the court via CERTIFIED MAIL.
Just the basics: your name & address, citation details, the date of the alleged infraction, the state/city where the ticket was issued, and the date you intend to mail the response. The intake form walks you through everything.
Absolutely. You are exercising your constitutional right to challenge evidence, demand due process, and question the validity of automated enforcement.
That’s normal. Automated systems photograph plates, not people. Our packet challenges the lack of a sworn witness, the state’s attempt to shift its burden of proof over to you (which isn’t legal under our established justice system), and the unverified chain of custody behind that image.
That’s a common tactic. The response packet we email to our customers includes language that forces the agency to acknowledge your right to dispute, even in jurisdictions that pretend camera tickets are “final.”
Yes. These systems rely on the same automated evidence and vendor contracts. What we provide is responsive to any scenario in which automated camera tickets are used to harass the general public with unconstitutional nonsense that state legislatures who care about civil liberties have no business enacting.
Perfect. That’s one of the strongest angles. The packet directly challenges private enforcement, vendor incentives, and non‑government issuance, which many states prohibit.
You’re still allowed to dispute the citation. Who you allow to drive your vehicle is nobody’s business.
Yes. The packet covers all automated enforcement, including red‑light, speed, school‑zone, work‑zone, and bus‑lane cameras.
The form is streamlined and only asks for the details needed to generate your personalized packet and transact a payment. If you have your camera ticket and a credit card handy, it should take no more than three minutes.
No. Camera tickets are typically civil, not moving violations. They do not go on your driving record, and insurers do not use them to raise rates.
If you receive more than one camera ticket, now or in the future, we recommend paying the one-time $67 fee for lifetime access. You can’t share it with others, but a great value if you need to use our solution more than once.